Powered By Blogger
Showing posts with label fake. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fake. Show all posts

Saturday, November 5, 2016

COMMENTS

Brad has behaved with dignity throughout all of this. He was well brought up in a good family and it shows unlike his dysfunctional wife.

What about her guzzling her red wine or puffing non stop on cigarettes instead of eating talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Stupid bitch she's trying to character assassinate him and it just makes her look worse, she's so vindictive.

with angelina always keep in mind the "timing" of when a stupid news from her and her "team" will come out. remember brad's movie "allied" will be showing in a few weeks so whatever crappy stupid obviously a lie news from her don't bother at all. she's a liar and always has been.

Regardless of AJ falling out of love or not. What bothers me most is that she wants full custody of the kids. Each parent should be given equal custody. Both parents and all the kids need it. That is very wrong for her to request and I hope a judge sees that.

I hate what this woman is doing. Mean control freak.

 this is what a better, sane, normal parent would and should be seeking if you have the best interest of your kids in your mind. always think what is best for your kids amids a divorce don't be bitter and hateful like angelina.

 Go for it Brad Pitt they are your kids too. Fight for them I think Angelina Jolie's lawyer and Angelina herself thought this is it hands down Brad won't wanna settle down with 6 kids well guess he told you Angelina !!!

She is a nut case. Giving her sole custody is extremely harmful to the children. She is not stable mentally, never has been, great actress but unstable

What mom would seriously try to take away kids from their father. I could see if you weren't married or never lived together, but these kids have grown up with him as their dad for many years. No matter how good of a mom you are every kid enjoys having a father or father figure in life. I hope he gets joint custody, that makes him even sexier

 Good for him, that show that he cares for the kids. I don't understand why some women think that they get to keep the kids just because, kids need their dads in their life too, share the news.

 Parents yell at their kids ,get over it...get a divorce and have joint custody...why put kids thru ya'll BS...

She's gross
Angelina STOP being an ashole

She's a crazy woman, always was

 I hate her and always have!! F Her!

 that's what the judge will rule anyway joint custody

As he should. Fight for your kids Brad!

Go brad go!!!

She cant have it all

TEAM BRAD

he deserves to have joint custody. Just shows how some women are so full of it and up their own arses thinking men are 2nd.

 I hope he gets full access to his kids. Shame they can't work it out amicably

.he did everything and more of what was asked. Still not enough for her.

I think"joint custody"is ideal for ALL children who have 2 competent, loving parents. Brad's trying to raise a MAN & mom's overreact!

I really commend him for not going after her. I think he could unload all sorts of secrets about how nuts she is. That he's not doing it is further proof of what a decent man he is and he's only concerned for the children.

Jolie is insane. Hopefully she loses custody and needs to have supervised visitation.

he should have joint custody.

As he should. As any good dad would...which he seems to be. He needs to be in the kids lives to balance out the kooky their mother brings.

She sure is a man eater. They both look like they have been drug around by the cat all night. Never got what he saw in her anyway. Use to be easy on the eye but not anymore. Then come her always crazy antics she is forever playing on. Getting a divorce, call in the FBI and then lets jet off England to get involved in politics. I'll give this man eater an aster for disaster. Oh, and by the way some hormone therapy should do wonders for her as she is starting to fade.

Good for Brad. While I think kids needs a mothers comfort. They also need their fathers love and influence. Who will show the boys how to be a gentlemen? And the girls what not to accept from boys? Their uncle and mom who kiss on the mouth in public ? Hmmm gotta think about that. There is a good humanitarian, but she doesn't, what do her kids think? Spoiling kids with toys where ever they go, is not parenting. Quality time and not buying their love is a great road to recovery for this family

good for him I really hope he gets it!!

yeah right forcing your kidds not see dad...thats high fasion style

Good! And I hope he gets it. Those children deserve better than being left with Angie to ruin them further. She must be furious that he hasnt rolled over and given her all her own way though. This is going to get messy. Hope the courts sort it quickly for their sakes as it's such a burden for young shoulders. Pax and Shiloh have asked to live with their father, I've read elsewhere, no idea if true, but this filing lends weight to it

Jolie hasn't once given a thought to those children and the effect on them. Selfish. (Dublin, Ireland)

He deserves to spend quality time with his children. Every father does they are his children as much as hers (Melbourne, Australia)

Good for him......nice to see a father fight for his kid's. So many just walk away without a care.

She wants sole custody, but will employ a load of nannys to look after them. She's a clown
( Leeds,United Kingdom)

A clown, best description of her yet!

He got all his ducks in a row - now he's coming for whats just. Now it's going to get interesting.

Brad has behaved with dignity throughout all of this. He was well brought up in a good family and it shows unlike his dysfunctional wife.

Go get them Brad.

Good for him. There's no reason for Angie to have full custody. Now hopefully some investigation has been going on all this time of Angie's parenting methods. It will be interesting to see if she fights him on this or if she will come to her senses and agree to joint custody. (Seattle, United States)

Good. I am a woman and I feel horrible how courts treat men during divorce. equal=equal

As a woman, thank you. I get sick seeing how men are treated! Equality means equal, not superior.

Angie Jolie is actually the one that high powered microscope of invasive inspection and full investigations by both the FBI & CPS need to begin exploring alongside Brad Pitt. Especially as she's had full custody over all the children; what better time could possibly be ripe enough for a thorough investigation & questioning of all the children & man nannies!?

Good...obviously the 'investigations' etc just have gone good for him. Team Brad!!!
(Vancouver, Canada)

Don't use the kids as pawns in a dead relationship. The kids are the ones who suffer the most

Some people here defend Jolie like she gives 2 licks about them. Like it's a vote for Brad or Jolie. What's right is right and wrong is wrong. Jolie is a nutcase and it will be like Madonna for her in a few years. Faking the British accent and screwing around and anything else for attention.

Brad Pitt wants to share responsibility for his own children. Shock horror. Dad's have rights too.

When all theses children become of age..... they'll all want to be with Brad anyway!

I'm always amazed by how she would say how much in love with him she was and now just hate. Terrible, terrible the way she treated him in this through the press.

I find it odd that only the bio-kids were given middle names, but having 6 kids 3 years into a relationship is also odd...and probably irresponsible given the current circumstances. Ms. Jolie-Pitt has a responsibility to these children to be civil and co-parent with the man she insisted on having them with. She needs to quit with the tantrum and act like an adult. P.S. put the kids in school F F S ( for fuck's sake)

He never hit the kids, he yelled at them. Any parent yells at their kids.

It should be joint custody, since nothing came of the allegations against him. Think she may be regretting letting him be a co-parent of the adopted children, but he is their father legally. Also feel she may be a control freak and would just lose her mind if he moves on and the kids get to know a new "step mommy". Oh well, you made your bed......

jolie is just a drunk and a druggie creep, give the kids to Brad for the sake of the kids

Angelina is a b!tch!!

I think angie has lost out of her mental stability way before this divorce was even thought of. I always sensed something was off or weird about her .

I think she is hurt worse then she let's people think she is and will do and say anything to hurt him or make him the bad guy. But he is their father ,and he wants to be around his kids. She should feel good about that.

He's a great dad & deserves joint custody.

How could she be so selfish???? Why does women put their interest first ahead of a child??? They want their children to grow up without a man. Horrible????🤔🤔🤔

 Go get her, Brad!!

Whether she likes it or not he is the father... And he deserves joint custody. Good on him i knew he wouldn't let those kids go without a fight

She don't want joint custody so she can live and go wherever she wants with the kids in tow. If it's joint she will have to live close. She is a mover! Kids need stability.

GOOD! I don't know her but from what ive ever read she seems like a control freak.

Good for brad pitt! Its about time his wife knows he is going to fight for his kids...shared custody is he way to go....

As it should be, shared custody is the right thing to do

Good for him. Don't let that bitch boss u around Brad!

They are going to end up with joint custody, no matter what

He is entitled, he is their father it is that simple.

Good for him, Angelina is psycho

 as he should !

Angelina is freaking psycho

She is horrid...ask the people that went to high school with her. Big goth bully...can't fool us Angie. You were rotten then and still are!

 ... and by all means, he should be granted !


 So he should and it's his right as a parent,custody of the kids is not a one way street.

And you should NEVER talk bad about the other parent in front of your kids. That's like telling them that half of them is bad, whether they're genetically theirs or adopted; just don't do it. It really is not that hard to get along with your ex if you set your pride aside and realize what is best for your children.

 He should have full custody she's a little cuckoo for my liking

The children need both their parents, so joint custody is fair.

So he should get joint custody they are his children too. Yelling at a child is not enough to deny a father his children and the children their father.

Why wouldn't he. Three are his biological children and the other three have been adopted by him and Angelina. He doesn't 'share' them with Angelina, he is their father.

 never read bad press about him, while the same can't be said for that junky ex-wife of his

team brad

So, Helic organizes the fauxmanitarian jaunts while Chloe Dalton writes her speeches. These two women must be desparate since they chose to work with Jolie, that's some serious downgrade. Anyway, even that stupid r@pe summit wasn't originally Jolie's idea, but Helic's. Everything she does is someone else's idea. Interesting how Helic worked closely w/Hague while admitting openly to be pro-US, hmm...

Helic and Dalton accompanied Jolie during her recent trip to Myanmar. They flew in a private jet. Did the UN pay for it? She is so insignificant, why wasting money on her? Such a jet-set 'humanitarian', such a hypocrite.

Well we could look at this way , since they have moved on to verbal and no charges were filed she obviously lied about Pitt hitting Maddox anywhere much less in the face. She is getting desperate .

Kids are BAD liars; anyone who knows how to question someone can easily get at the truth or at least establish "reasonable doubt" that the truth is being told.

This is what she did when she boycotted the press and made them sign agreements. Some refused . Others got pissed and talked badly about her. She turned it around by having her lawyers take the blame. I remember that. It's always someone's fault. Never hers.

Physical abuse is easier to prove than verbal/psychological abuse. Bruises can't be denied. She's now claiming verbal abuse because she didn't get what she wanted in the custody battle. Verbal abuse is just HOlie speak for disciplining the kids. This will drag out a while. Meanwhile, the kids are residing with her and getting coached as to what to say.

Guess he is realizing now she wasn't "misunderstood"

She is sick in the head!

pitt has a great career, is a very versatile actor and is one of bigger stars in world, critics respect him
pitt has 3 oscar noms, 5 golden globe noms (1 win), 2 sag noms, 3 bafta noms, won the best actor award on venice festival (the second most important film festival in the world, after cannes) and won best actor award on new york critics awards (the most important critics award).

I have been saying for years he has a great career in HW Angie is done but Brad has been steadily working & producing - he is not going to lose his career because of this - he will be fine.

Absolutely. I think all Jolie accomplished with this is - or will be - the utter destruction of her public perception as a "humanitarian," soon to be replaced with "crazy biotch."

I guess he has seen the light and is going to play hardball and fight back. He should get custody, she's a whack job!

And why shouldn't he? I would give him full custody if I were the judge, he seems to be the only one who's mentally balanced of the two-- Poor guy, I feel for him-- his love for the children clearly shows. Jolie is a totally narcissistic, vindictive, unbalanced person.

If nothing else, asking for joint custody immediately makes him looks more balanced, willing to compromise and sane, compared to her. (Akhetaten, Egypt)

Jolie has a strange relationship, with Maddox. Jolie favors him over the other kids. Shiloh noticed the strong bond and decided to dress like Maddox, to get her Mom's attention. I'm not surprised that Shiloh wants to live with Brad. Nothing worse in a kids life, than a mother that doesn't pay attention to you. Heartbreaking!!

Equally, THE CHILDREN deserve to spend equal time with both parents! And if she does not do the right thing, this whole thing will backfire on her, never underestimate the power of children and fact that your "enemy", is their parent whom they love dearly! See what is happening with Rocco! Not that Madonna did anything wrong, but Rocco is the one making decisions where he wants to live, that fact that his mother is a superstar, means nothing to him, his needs were met being with his dad and that is where he is! All the money & access to the best lawyers, Rocco still won!

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

BEST OF THE BLOG: THE ANGELINA JOLIE PROBLEM

AUG. 23 2012

It used to be that everyone who read my blog knew me in real life. I’m glad to say that’s not true anymore (hello, new readers!). So that we can get to know each other better, I’ve decided to feature a few of the most discussed posts from my old blog. Let’s begin right here, with my Hollywood nemesis. That’s right, Angelina Jolie. This was originally posted on 5.26.11.
It’s 4:30 pm and I’m already halfway through my first glass of wine. Why? Because the bugs are back. That’s right: lice. Again. No one indulged my wish to be smothered with a pillow so I’ve spent the day in an incredible state of tension while combing, clipping, picking, vacuuming and washing. I need a break. Blogging sounds good. When I asked Facebook friends to help me come up with some topics the other day, man – did they come through! I’ll start with an easy one, and one that fits my terrible mood: “Tell us why you don’t like Angelina Jolie.” Here we go…

1. Bitch is fake.
This is probably my biggest beef with AJ. We should really be calling her Angie Voight, by the way, since that’s her name, but whatever. I understand that it is common in Hollywood to be called by other than one’s government name, and apparently her actual middle name is Jolie. But I think it is hilarious that she goes by Jolie instead of Voight. Voight. Say it out loud and you will smile as you picture her struttin’ around Cannes as Angie Voight. You know how when you are in another country and some shop or restaurant is randomly named an English word? Like an “American-style” restaurant in Italy will be called Buffalo or something. Or a clothing store in Paris will be called Gigolo. You always kind of crack up. Do you think the French crack up at Ange calling herself “Little Angie Beautiful”?

The name, though, is only the tip of the fake iceberg. As long as Angie has been on our radar, she has aggressively positioned herself as “other”, one who looks down on the fakeness of Hollywood. Um, what has she done as an “actor” that makes her different from any other starlet, other than have brown hair? (I know – she’s an ambassador and has 40 kids. We’ll get to that.) Tattoos? Yawn. Dabbling in lesbianism? Next! She’s still had the nose job and the boob job. Don’t believe me? Click here or do a simple Google search. Such a cliched route and especially funny because she’s always acting like all that bullshit is beneath her.

Caveat: making out with her brother. That was genuinely freaky. Ick. Nast.

2. She’s a crap actress.
Did we all see “Girl, Interrupted”? Cruddy, overwrought melodrama, right? And probably the worst part was Ange’s big-eyed “I’m crazy! Look how totally crazy and wacked I am! I’m so nuts that you don’t know what I’ll do next!” I knew she and I weren’t gonna be friends after seeing her in that piece o’ trash. And she won and Oscar ™ for it! Hahaha.

I’m not laughing.

Can you name anything she was great in? A great movie or even a crappy movie that she was good in? No? Thought so. Angie drops bad movies like a ho droppin’ knickers (tm Lady Sovereign.) Actually, I loved the trailer for that universally-panned movie she did with a bloated looking Johnny Depp. She kept me guessing what her accent was supposed to be and it kind of kept me interested. You know, for that 2 minutes.

3. She’s not a good mom.
Yeah, I went there. I said it. Let’s forget for a minute the tiny detail that I haven’t actually met her, her husband or any of their children. Admit it: as Americans, we LOVE to judge and comment on everyone else’s parenting, whether they are famous or our neighbor down the street. We always “tsk, tsk” and shake our heads with a quick answer of how we would have done it differently (and better). So indulge me.

Seems to me that one of the messages I’ve heard about child development over and over is that young children need consistency. Right? A consistent, predictable routine for bedtime, mealtimes and getting ready to leave the house seems to be pretty widely accepted as best practice. We want kids to have a place – like a bedroom – that is theirs alone and we want them to begin to recognize familiar and loving faces. As a person who does a truly embarrassing amount of celebrity tracking, I know for sure that Angie and Brad’s kids have none of those things. They are constantly being enrolled and then withdrawn from preschools around the world and seem to constantly be adjusting to a new time zone or hotel suite. Yes, you say, but what about all that they are gaining from being world travelers? What about that? Well, as anyone who’s been around a kid knows, they are usually just as entertained by the cardboard box as they are with the cool toy that just came out of it, if not more so. To paraphrase Randall’s awesome narration of the honeybadger video, kids don’t give a shit. Trust me on this: those kids are too damn young to be getting much out of globetrotting. They’d be as happy to play in a park in New York as in Jerusalem. The world travel is just part of their movie star parents’ quest for fame. That’s it.

Now the tough part. I have to acknowledge the huge amount of money and press she and Brad have generated for important and sometimes overlooked causes around the world. That can’t be called into question. Whatever their reasons for doing it (and I think you can guess I don’t think it’s entirely selfless), more celebs should follow their example of giving the proceeds from their photo shoots to worthy charities. Yes, I concede: Angie does a lot of good, and maybe that’s enough for me to change my stance on her.

Nah.

PS: While writing this blog entry, I have completed another load of laundry and done another head check. In my mind, I hear Randall’s voice saying, “Lice. Ew, that’s so nasty!”

not mine.credit and owner: REALLY REAL ATLANTA HOUSEWIFE




Monday, September 26, 2016

Jolie exposes her ‘rebel-turned-saint’ myth by trashing Pitt

By Maureen Callahan September 25, 2016 | 6:47 am


Possibly the only thing more surprising than the news that Angelina Jolie filed for divorce from Brad Pitt was the unceasing, unremitting details.

As a brand, Brangelina spent more than a decade on lockdown: Their camp had no leaks. Tabloids knew nothing the couple didn’t want known. Their image as the chic-est, jet-setting-est, most racially harmonious family on Earth was impenetrable.

Until Tuesday, when Jolie’s filing demanding sole physical custody sent the media into overdrive: What had Pitt, heretofore known as a devoted father, possibly done?

Incredibly, almost on the hour, the story kept advancing: TMZ reported that Jolie had concerns “with the way Brad was parenting” and that she was “fed up” with his heavy use of weed and alcohol. He had an “anger problem.”

Next came accusations of Pitt cheating — with a co-star and with Russian hookers, their nationality an odd detail — of using hard drugs, and of verbally and physically attacking one of their children on a private plane.

Within 72 hours, the world knew more about Brangelina than in the 12 years they had been together. It was sordid and dirty, the photo negative of the perfect ­image they had so smugly, aggressively promoted.

The likeliest source of that narrative flip? Angelina Jolie, who at 41 has masterfully manipulated the media for over two decades.

Strategically, Jolie seems miles ahead of Pitt, but she may lose the long game. Video reportedly exists of the plane incident, and no physical altercation is said to have occurred. People have come to ­admire her, but they love him.

“The whole thing seems very impetuous,” says Jolie’s biographer, Andrew Morton. “Her mother would freeze out people for whatever reason, and now Angie has frozen out Brad — who was far more dignified and just issued a quiet statement.”

By so publicly disparaging the father of her children — some old enough to read what’s being said online — Jolie is endangering her own self-created myth, that of ­depraved Hollywood hellion-turned-St. Angelina, humanitarian nonpareil.

“It’s Bad Dad vs. St. Ange,” Morton says. “The ultimate losers are the children.”

And Jolie’s halo, which may be revoked.

It’s easy to forget how deeply weird Angelina Jolie was when she came on the scene in the mid-’90s. There’s an entire generation that knows her as an actress, yes, but more so as the selfless philanthropist, the devoted mother of six, one-half of the most glamorous couple in Hollywood.

Jolie has never used a publicist, and this has only added to the sense — true or not — that she’s authentic. But she is, at heart, an actress. Jolie and her estranged father, actor Jon Voight, share one key trait: Both, she’s said, are “drama queens.”

As a pre-millennial starlet, Jolie was unlike any of her peers. She was in stark opposition to the arch, cosmopolitan WASP-iness of Gwyneth Paltrow, who was then engaged to Pitt. She made Winona Ryder’s eccentric darkness seem purely adolescent. Drew Barrymore, with her trauma, her drug use and mid-20s marriage spree, could not compare.

Jolie carved her own niche, controlled her own narrative, and it was impossible to look away. She was the wildest of the wild. She divulged thoughts and experiences so outlandish, you had to wonder how much was true.

She spoke of self-harm, rampant drug use — heroin, she said, her favorite — her bisexuality, how much she loved knife-play and S&M, her history of insomnia and eating disorders, of committing herself to the psych ward at UCLA for 72 hours, of suicidal ideations and of once hiring a hit man to kill her before changing her mind. All this by age 22.

In 1996, she married British actor Jonny Lee Miller. She said she wed in a white shirt with Miller’s name scrawled in blood on the back.

They divorced in 2000, the same year Jolie began cavorting with her brother, James Haven, on red carpets, making out in front of photographers. When she won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar that year for “Girl, Interrupted,” she gushed over him in her acceptance speech.

“I’m so in love with my brother right now,” she said.

It was too weird, even by Hollywood standards. Haven quickly receded from Jolie’s public life, and within weeks, she wed her “Pushing Tin” co-star Billy Bob Thornton, who was then engaged to actress Laura Dern.

Modal Trigger
Angelina Jolie and Billy Bob Thornton in 2000Photo: WireImage
“I left our home to work on a movie,” Dern told Talk magazine in 2000, “and while I was away, my boyfriend got married, and I’ve never heard from him again.”

Jolie and Thornton — then 24 and 44, respectively — embraced their role as Hollywood’s premier freak-show couple. They wore ­vials of each other’s blood around their necks and boasted of wild sex on fur-lined harnesses.

The marriage lasted four years, until the moment Jolie said was life-changing: her decision, while filming “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” in Cambodia, to adopt a child.

“I knew once I committed to Maddox,” she said, “I would never be self-destructive again.”

Jolie divorced Thornton. “She used the same M.O. as with Brad — accused him of having affairs and being drunk,” says Morton, her biographer. “As soon as Maddox came along, Billy Bob had served his purpose.”

Thus Jolie began her pivot from savage, man-stealing sex bomb to valiant single mom of an indigent child. She began working with the United Nations as a goodwill ambassador. Her time in Cambodia, she said, “made me suddenly realize certain things about the world and how much I had to learn.”

She was a spoiled Hollywood brat who orchestrated her public awakening to the less fortunate and duly expressed shame. As an actress, things were less exciting. She trudged along in a series of unremarkable movies: “Original Sin,” “Life or Something Like It,” “Beyond Borders,” “Alexander.”

It wasn’t until 2004, when she replaced Nicole Kidman in a film called “Mr. & Mrs. Smith,” that Angelina Jolie’s star power ­became stratospheric.

This, of course, was the movie where Pitt and Jolie met and fell in love. At the time, Pitt was married to Jennifer Aniston, and they were considered Hollywood’s golden couple: he the wholesome, Midwestern matinee idol, content with a bong and a beer, she the A-list star of “Friends,” the breezy, sort-of-plain popular girl who had landed the high school quarterback.

Jolie, with or without Pitt’s knowledge, helped extricate him from that marriage expertly. In April 2005, amid rumors of their affair, Pitt flew to visit Jolie and her toddler son in Kenya. Paparazzi somehow knew to be there, and a now-iconic image of Jolie, Pitt and Maddox made the cover of US Weekly.

Aniston had said goodbye to Pitt hours earlier, with no knowledge of his plans. “The world was shocked, and I was shocked,” Aniston told Vanity Fair that year.

Rumors were rampant that Jolie was pregnant with Pitt’s baby — compounding the tabloid narrative that Pitt badly wanted to be a dad but, denied by his career-obsessed wife, had no choice but to leave.

“My worst fear,” Aniston’s friend Kristin Hahn told Vanity Fair, “is that Jen will have to face them having a baby together soon, because that would be beyond painful.”

In July of that year, Jolie adopted a baby girl from Ethiopia, an event she announced in People magazine. She began heavily publicizing her work as a UN ambassador. To paraphrase the old saying about Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire: Jolie gave Pitt gravitas, and Pitt gave her respectability.

In May 2007, the couple relocated to Namibia, where a heavily pregnant Jolie was again shot by paparazzi, with Pitt and her two children, on otherwise empty sand dunes — this, even though the couple had gotten the Namibian government to ban all journalists from entry so she could give birth there.

After their daughter Shiloh was born, Pitt and Jolie gave a press conference only to Namibian reporters. They sat on a dais with Namibia’s president, Sam Nujoma, formerly the country’s dictator, and began their spin off planet Earth.

In 2007, Jolie began forcing celebrity journalists to sign contracts before interviewing her. These forbade “any questions regarding her personal relationships,” even though her personal relationships were exactly what she was selling. In April of that year, People glowingly reported Jolie’s adoption of a 3-year-old boy from Vietnam.

His mother was still living, and Jolie changed his name from Pham Quang Sang to Pax. He spoke no English, but no matter — the magazine deified Jolie, shooting her in profile, holding her new toddler as they gazed off at the horizon. In less than two years, Jolie and Pitt had a family of four.

“I know we seem crazy, just bringing them in one after the other,” Jolie told the New York Times in 2008, the year she gave birth to twins Knox and Vivienne.

“But we do plan,” she said. “We make sure one is absorbed completely into the family before we add ­another.”

Sanding down their scandalous origin story further, Jolie founded the Maddox Jolie Pitt Foundation in 2006. Though the couple have always said they donate all the money they make from selling family photos to magazines, tax filings raise questions.

In 2008, the year they sold pictures of the twins to People for $14 million, the foundation gave away a little over $6 million. The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees got $100,000; the Council on Foreign Relations — which extended membership to Jolie the year before — got $110,000, and Pitt’s own nonprofit, Make It Right, got $1 million.

The year before, the MJP Foundation listed itself as a “consultant” to Make It Right, earning $204,867 in fees. It also listed nearly $4 million in assets invested with, among others, Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch. They donated just $1.4 million, with $333,000 going to the UNHCR, which finally, after nearly $1 million in total donations from MJP, named Jolie a special envoy in 2012.

In 2014, People paid $2 million for the Jolie-Pitt wedding photos. But the magazine doesn’t appear on MJP Foundation filings. However, Asprey, the jewelry company that has commissioned designs from the couple, does.

Reps for Pitt and ­Jolie did not return requests for comment.

As adroit as she has been, Jolie has seemed to lose touch with how she’s actually perceived. Her pretension has become boundless: bragging to a UK radio program that her six kids speak seven languages, including sign language.

“Vivienne really wanted to learn Arabic,” she said.

Vivienne is 8.

Jolie has been publicly on the verge of quitting acting since 2005, ready to sacrifice movie stardom for her kids — never a mention of the nannies — her charities, the world. In November, she begins a visiting professorship at the London School of Economics. She is reportedly seeking to move to England permanently to join the House of Lords, which requires UK citizenship, and remake herself yet again, this time as a politician.

“I’ve never loved being in front of the camera,” she said in 2014.

It’s a transition sparked, most likely, by her failed attempts to become a serious writer-director. Each successive film — 2011’s “In the Land of Blood and Honey,” 2014’s “Unbroken” and last year’s disasterpiece, “By the Sea,” in which she and Pitt played a couple on the verge of divorce — has bombed exponentially.

The Sony hack revealed true ­industry opinion of Jolie. “Minimally talented spoiled brat,” wrote super-producer Scott Rudin to then-Sony chief Amy Pascal. “She’s a camp event and a celebrity and that’s all.”

By seeking to elevate herself by denigrating Pitt, Jolie’s hypocrisy has begun to show. Whatever went down on that plane, it most likely can’t be worse than having her children witness their father’s public humiliation at their mother’s hands — the ultimate irony for a woman who prides herself on motherhood above all.

As she told the New York Times in 2008, she was already worried about what her children might read about their lives. “There’s a lot we’re going to have to explain to them,” she said, “about how public their family is.”

Additional reporting by Isabel Vincent

not mine.credit and source: NEW YORK POST